Pinko Cowards - Blind Chihuahuas Playground

Reply · Quote

Caliban

2006-04-27, 22:01 #1

Member since Apr 2006 · 4 posts
Group memberships: Members

Show profile ·

Link to this post

Subject: Pinko Cowards

Get a load of this week's cover from The Nation, a liberal rag that has no messages other than hate Israel, hate Bush. They think they're so brave for depicting the President of the United States going down a toilet with a stupid expression on his face, which they draw as an ape-like caricature. There was a time in the US when its leaders were accorded a minimum of respect, and common decency would not have permitted this kind of thing.

The President of Iran is a much worse character, and a real right wing A-hole to boot. But don't hold your breath waiting for The Nation to do a similar cartoon of him. They're just nasty little cowards, all bark, no bite, and run back to master for protection if anyone looks at them twice.

The author has attached one file to this post:

nationcover.jpg 23.2 kBytes
You have no permission to open this file.

Reply · Quote

scooper 2006-11-08, 21:49 #2

User title: Pooper Scooper
Member since Apr 2006 · 51 posts · Location: United States
Group memberships: Language Moderators, Members

Show profile ·

Link to this post

Caliban,

The Nation has long been a left-leaning magazine, and exhibited considerable courage in remaining so during the McCarthy Era, when those suspected of sympathizing with Communism had their careers destroyed. But I agree with you that they stand up more vigorously to right-wing extremism in the US than they do to the same when it is exhibited abroad. You won't see The Nation running the Muhammad cartoons. I'm not convinced that its cowardice on their parts. It may be that they are just Occidentalists - which would make them self-hating Westerners.

Because there is more to Religion than pleasing your Imaginary Friend.

Reply · Quote

walksntalks (Guest) 2007-04-17, 00:30 #3

No profile available.

Link to this post

hey, sorry i have to disagree with you about there having been a time when this country respected it's leaders so much that they wouldn't so insult them with nasty cartoons. As long as press and newspapers have existed gossip, opinion, indecency, rumor, and drama have ruled the reported stories and events. The first newspapers were actually run by postmasters who would rummage through people's mail and write about the tastiest stories they found! Print-journalism was actually grounded on gossip. You'll also find that most newspapers and journals that existed during the formation of this country, especially when bi-partisanism really took root, most political journals were extreme in their bashing of candidates and party members of the opposite wing (left or right). Also i think that its important for some social text to always be able to mock, criticize, belittle, or even demean our leaders. If we ever lost the right or ability to do so in a mass-mediated way, one of the essential pieces of free press would be lost. Remember, even though press was a brand-new and seemingly trivial concept during the 18th century, our forefathers knew its potential would one day be realized, and took measures to protecting its free use for all citizens in the first amendment. It's true that overtly rude and indecent humor/mockery of US leaders has tended to remain on the fringes of social popularity, but some subversive sardonic forms of humor have proven to remain quite popular throughout history. Among them is satire, shows like the simpsons, family guy, magazines like MAD, and books like Gulliver's Travels are just some examples of recent satires that have mocked political leaders. At the very least such social texts remind us that the leaders are not inerrant and are just as human as the rest of us, which if ever forgot could be much more dangerous than a few hurt feelings.