Virtual Church of the Blind Chihuahua Forum

Blind Chihuahuas Playground

Not logged in. · Lost password · Register
Forum: Politics, Culture & Environment RSS
The Jihad Next Door
Islamofacism in a neighborhood near you
Reply
Avatar
Reply · Quote scooper #1
User title: Pooper Scooper
Member since Apr 2006 · 51 posts · Location: United States
Group memberships: Language Moderators, Members
Show profile · Link to this post
Subject: The Jihad Next Door
Yesterday, I went to a lecture on Islamic Fundamentalism and Terrorism by Rabbi Arthur Zuckerman. He talked about what the US could learn from Israel in regard to living with repeated attacks using Improvised Explosive Devices (IEDs). Some are vehicle-borne (VBIEDs) like that used by Tim McVeigh to bomb the Murrah building. Some are deposited where they can do the most cruel damage, like the bomb hidden in the bottom tray of a birdcage so that it can blow shrapnel through the child that picks it up, as well as everyone nearby. Or like the bomb hidden in a hollowed out melon to kill her mother and her fellow shoppers getting groceries for the evening meal. And then there is the human-guided IED, popularly mis-named the suicide bomber.

These folks are not merely mis-guided. These folks are evil.

In particular, they pervert the Word of God to make it justify their actions. Why? Because they are from an honor/shame culture in which the lowest thing a man can be is powerless, and the only way for a man to redeem himself is through acts of power. Since the ultimate power is that of life-and-death, killing is what they do. They believe this brings honor to God, and honor to Islam. And that bringing this honor guarantees them a place in heaven.

So, despite the list of grievances that Michael Scheuer claims the Islamofacists (or Jihaddicts) use to recruit new members, their goal is not the redress of these grievances. All honor is due to Allah, and they will not stop until everyone worships Him in the proper manner, or acknowledges the dominion of those who do. They are not trying to get the West to leave them alone. They are not trying to stop Globalization. They are trying to dictate its terms.

And they are bringing their war here. As if 9/11, the Madrid bombings, and the London Underground bombings were not enough. Rabbi Zuckerman showed videos of no less than six Imams preaching violent jihad against all non-Muslims. One of them even reminded his male listeners to attend firearms shooting practice after the prayer-service. And they were all preaching in mosques in American cities.

It seems that not all American Muslims are looking out for America.
Because there is more to Religion than pleasing your Imaginary Friend.
This post was edited on 2006-04-25, 22:39 by scooper.
Avatar
Reply · Quote scooper #2
User title: Pooper Scooper
Member since Apr 2006 · 51 posts · Location: United States
Group memberships: Language Moderators, Members
Show profile · Link to this post
Subject: Benedict agrees, Moussaoui corroborates
Apparently I'm not the only one who thinks the Jihaddicts pervert the Word of God. Read this from Pope Benedict's address to the Holy See's diplomatic corps this past January:

Attention has rightly been drawn to the danger of a clash of civilizations. The danger is made more acute by organized terrorism, which has already spread over the whole planet. Its causes are many and complex, not least those to do with political ideology, combined with aberrant religious ideas. Terrorism does not hesitate to strike defenseless people, without discrimination, or to impose inhuman blackmail, causing panic among entire populations, inorder to force political leaders to support the designs of the terrorists. No situation can justify such criminal activity, which covers the perpetrators with imfamy, and it is all the more deplorable when it hides behind religion, thereby bringing the pure truth of God down to the level of the terrorists' own blindness and moral perversion.

This was noted in the Opinion page of the Wall Street Journal last Friday (April 14) right next to an editorial which quoted Zacharias Moussaoui's justification of his wanting to participate in the 9/11 attack:

You [Americans] must be subdued. We [Muslims] must be above you.

It's not about specific grievances. It's about a perverted theology that justifies spreading Islam or Islamic domination by means of unlimited violence. It isn't properly a jihad so much as a radical Islamist crusade.
Because there is more to Religion than pleasing your Imaginary Friend.
Avatar
Reply · Quote scooper #3
User title: Pooper Scooper
Member since Apr 2006 · 51 posts · Location: United States
Group memberships: Language Moderators, Members
Show profile · Link to this post
Subject: This is serious, folks.
In case you think i'm blowing things out of proportion, take a look at this map and this website. We are not dealing with a single command-cadre organization holed up in a few remote caves, but with a global social movement that glorifies and commits unlimited violence in the Name of God. More about that at Li'l Johnnie's Jihad Page.

It's time to wake up to the fact that, even without Afghanistan and Iraq, we are still at war, and will be at war for a very long time. And the war has no fronts and respects no boundaries. Because, as devout Christian Blaise Pascal put it, "Men never do evil so cheerfully and completely as when they do it in the name of Religion."
Because there is more to Religion than pleasing your Imaginary Friend.
This post was edited on 2006-04-25, 22:43 by scooper.
Reply · Quote Aussiescribbler #4
Member since Oct 2006 · 7 posts · Location: Adelaide, South Australia
Show profile · Link to this post
Subject: Containment of violent forms of insanity, not a "war on terror"
I think we should stop using the term "war on terror" for two reasons :

1. It serves to win support for terrorists. Anyone who commits an act of murder, threatens an act of murder or seeks to incite an act of murder, is a criminal, not a soldier in a war. These people need to be isolated and treated as the deranged criminals they are. Saying that they are part of a war against our civilisation just serves to glorify them and win support for them from others who have a grudge - rational or otherwise - against Western society.

2. The term "war on terror" is open to exploitation by unscrupulous politicians. War, in a military sense, is not an appropriate response to terrorism. War breeds terrorism. And it is all too easy to claim that the invasion of another country is part of a "war on terrorism" when it is actually being carried out for another primary purpose as was the case with the invasion of Iraq.

I think it is also important to recognise that what we are seeing in the phenomenon of Islamofascism and the terrorism which accompanies it, is the death throws of a rigid ideology which has outlived its usefulness. I was watching a bit of a television program the other night about Islamic homosexuals and their problems finding acceptance within the Islamic community. Their's is a difficult plight, but it seemed to me that the rigid Imam's who try to control this behaviour are trying to repress their own sexual feelings. In the end repression never works. As all that has been repressed pushes up from below, the ego becomes more rigid and dogmatic, and even sometimes violent, in a vain attempt to maintain order. The more rigid and dogmatic the ego structure the closer the battle is to being lost. We only have to deal with these people when they commit a crime as we would with anyone else who committed that crime. We don't have to fight their fundamentalism as that will collapse in due course as do all forms of denial.
This post was edited on 2006-11-26, 18:15 by Aussiescribbler.
Avatar
Reply · Quote scooper #5
User title: Pooper Scooper
Member since Apr 2006 · 51 posts · Location: United States
Group memberships: Language Moderators, Members
Show profile · Link to this post
Aussiescribbler,

I agree with you that "War on Terror," is inappropriate. However, we are indeed in a war, which I believe to be World War IV. I object to the term "War on Terror," because it names a technique not an adversary. And you can't win a war if you can't even name your adversary. Calling it the War against Islamofacism may be accurate, but it has no resonance within much of the Islamic world, which little appreciates the evil that 20th century facism was. I prefer "War against the Global Islamofacist Hirabah," which couples Islamofacism with a term that does have resonance in Islam - hirabah - which connotes "illegal war," "brigandage" or even "terrorism." Specifically it refers to warfare that is not sanctioned by the religion of Islam - which includes the killing of women, children, and non-combatants. The doctrine of jihad was comparable to the Catholic notion of "Just War," at least until Usama and company corrupted it.

The Global Islamofacist Hirabah would love for you to convince the world to deal with them using the methods of law enforcement only. They have a 25-year track record of being able to deal very successfully with that. I'm afraid that the only way through this conflict is to make the GIH so insecure in their homelands, that they can't spend the resources to damage us in our homelands.

As to the sanity or criminality of the Hirabists, I refer you to Marc Sageman's book, "Understanding Terror Networks." Sageman is a psychiatrist who studied many Hirabists, and found them to be neither crazy nor criminal (in the sense that they scrupulously obeyed what they believed to be Islamic Law).

I also agree with your assessment that the Fundamentalism which motivates the Hirabists is a symptom of a desperate reaction against modernity, and that over time it will burn itself out. The problem is what happens during that time. They are actively seeking not just to frighten us, but to destroy us by any means they can obtain, including chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear weapons. We must go beyond the limitations of law enforcement (which seeks to convict perpetrators after the fact of their crime) and learn to fight this war effectively, i.e. to inhibit the ability of the Hirabists to commit acts of terrorism.
Because there is more to Religion than pleasing your Imaginary Friend.
Close Smaller – Larger + Reply to this post:
Verification code: VeriCode Please note the verification code from the picture into the text field next to it.
Smileys: :-) ;-) :-D :-p :blush: :cool: :rolleyes: :huh: :-/ <_< :-( :'( :#: :scared: 8-( :nuts: :-O
Special characters:
Reply
Go to forum
This board is powered by the Unclassified NewsBoard software, 20080531-dev, © 2003-8 by Yves Goergen
Current time: 2008-07-23, 13:24:25 (UTC -07:00)

Home | Chapel | DogPAC | Forum | Gallery | Giftshop | Graveyard | Mailroom | Restroom | School | Scriptorium

©The Virtual Church of the Blind Chihuahua™, all rights reserved, unless otherwise noted.